Motifiti
2010 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser
Side by side on everything we can count. We do not inspect cars, so nothing here says which one is the better buy.
| Measure | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover God -1 | Sold 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser MISSCARDEALSKE LTD |
|---|---|---|
| Price Asking price. We do not inspect cars or check what they are worth. | KES 2,050,000 | KES 2,050,000 |
| Against the typical one on Motifiti Half of that model is priced above the typical figure and half below. | KES 9,700,000 below typical ✓ | KES 2,700,000 below typical |
| Year | 2010 ✓ | 2004 |
| Mileage | 146,182 km ✓ | 172,000 km |
| Fuel economy An estimate for this model, not a measurement of this car. | Not stated | 7.0 km/l |
| Engine | 3000cc | 3400cc |
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Transmission | automatic | automatic |
| Condition | Kenyan Used | Kenyan Used |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Where it is | Not stated | Around Nairobi |
The 2010 Land Rover Range Rover comes out ahead on 3 of these, the 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser on 0. Which of those matter is your call. Winning three small measures does not outweigh losing one big one.
Prices are what sellers are asking, not valuations. We do not inspect vehicles or verify their condition, mileage or paperwork. Always view a car and have it checked before you pay anything.